🔗 Share this article

Through a unsigned order, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to employ a redrawn congressional boundary scheme that could add up to five new Republican-leaning districts. The 6-3 ruling, handed down on Thursday, approves a request by the state to set aside a federal judge's ruling that had invalidated the boundaries in November.

Court's Rationale

The lower court improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, causing much confusion and upsetting the sensitive equilibrium in elections, the order stated in explaining its ruling.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had likely sorted voters based on their race – a method known as racial gerrymandering – when it passed the boundaries. It had instructed the state to revert to the districts drawn after the most recent national count for the forthcoming election.

Stinging Dissenting Opinion

In a forcefully written dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's ruling. She contended that it disregarded the work of the lower court, observing that its opinion was crafted by a judge nominated by ex-President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan argued in a opinion supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, The majority's order ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its increased favoritism, will dictate next year's elections. And it means that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced consistently, is a violation of the U.S. Constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Fight

The ruling comes amid a nationwide battle over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in efforts to transform the U.S. House map to protect a slim Republican hold. Ordinarily, redistricting happens after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to proceed with a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a chain reaction among other states.

Republicans in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that might create several additional conservative seats. Democrats, meanwhile, have pushed back with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those potential gains.

Partisan Reactions

Lone Star State top lawyer welcomed the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order defended Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that secures representation favorable to Republicans. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he stated.

In contrast, opposition party leaders decried the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the chair of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another leading House figure argued the court had yet again shredded its standing by upholding a race-based map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he added.