🔗 Share this article

Itranspired Ruben Amorim could survive defeat by Grimsby. He weathered losing a crucial continental showpiece against a particularly poor Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive losing at home against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, undermining some of the club’s most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a top-flight right-back in Blackburn’s championship campaign, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and appears to have missed. The most casual observer will notice the paradoxical situation: a manager who often railed at his players for losing one-on-one duels succumbing when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of a England's top division's most feared sporting directors.

In truth, this entire bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, given his brief stint in a similar role at Southampton, to view him as merely a functionary within the club's structure: a man whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive as any verifiable talent. How mistaken we all were. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, he has proved himself as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that the club's competitors are now rightly wary.

The Tactical Conflict Over Formation and Philosophy

To illustrate, this was the director who being involved in the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach in the first place, was instrumental in trying to persuade him to ditch his favored formation. Naturally, these pleas were resisted. However, these judgements hold greater authority when issued by a man with the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of three England caps and a role in a championship team from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually he might agree to outline his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise why Amorim is departing with full compensation, without any penalty clause in place. The director speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – function at a level beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear would be high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not quite the same as being prepared to comprehend it.

An Ultimate Power In Command

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the directives of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his preference for a back four. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for United to adopt analytics and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he announced that United’s style of play “shall be determined in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate football matters, drawing from his background in industry and yachting. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Who else would you trust to oversee a strategic plan of austerity, the building of a modern arena that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of a new striker?

The New Football Hierarchy: Executives Over Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing in top-tier football. Historically, clubs foolishly delegated major sporting choices to subordinate staff like managers, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously possible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and energy to go into an organization and implement their plan through to completion. But how many companies have such individuals set up? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Better by far to place genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the strategy in the boardroom and hire a coach who can tailor their methods to suit. If managers were once chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the product, but still finally accountable should it be delivered cold or fails of the box.

Nowadays, a coach's role is increasingly less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the public face for a club they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for talking. Wilfried Nancy sees his standing damaged whereas the people who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Game: Accountability Only for the Coaches

And possibly in a small way this is simply corporate governance at work: the elevation of a gilded overclass who can never be wrong, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the system coach only to dismiss him for playing excessively that system. Hire the project manager and then discard them for requiring too long. And above all show gratitude; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.